General News

Yes, lane splitting is legal in Minnesota but only under specific conditions. As of July 1, 2025, Minnesota Statute 169.974 permits motorcyclists to pass vehicles within the same traffic lane. The change came from the Minnesota Legislature, and it rewrote decades of traffic law in a single amendment.

Under MN Statute 169.974, a motorcyclist may pass another vehicle in the same lane if they’re traveling at no more than 25 miles per hour and no more than 15 miles per hour faster than the surrounding traffic. Once traffic speeds back up past that threshold, the rider has to merge back into a single lane like everyone else.

The law also draws hard lines around where lane splitting is allowed in Minnesota. According to guidance from the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety, lane splitting and filtering cannot happen in roundabouts, school zones, active work zones, or on freeway on-ramps where vehicles are queued. These restrictions exist because visibility and reaction time are different in these tighter environments.

None of this changes the fact that motorcycle accidents remain some of the most severe crashes that can happen on Minnesota roads. Even a minor miscalculation at low speed can lead to catastrophic injury. If you or someone you love has been hurt in a crash involving a motorcycle, it’s important to understand how this new law may apply to your case.

What Is Lane Splitting vs. Lane Filtering?

The law treats these two maneuvers differently. The distinction comes down to one main thing: whether traffic is moving.

Lane Splitting

Lane splitting happens when traffic is still moving. A motorcyclist passes a vehicle within the same lane while both are traveling forward, just at different speeds. This is only legal within the speed limit parameters bolded above.

Lane Filtering

Lane filtering happens when traffic has stopped entirely, like at red lights or in stop-and-go congestion. The motorcyclist moves between stopped vehicles to reach the front of the line, staying at or below 15 miles per hour.

Motorcyclists or Motorists: Who’s at Fault in a Lane Splitting Accident?

This is the question that matters most after a crash, and the answer isn’t always straightforward.

Driver Responsibility

Most lane splitting and filtering crashes don’t happen because a driver deliberately blocked a rider. They happen because a driver simply didn’t look.

Before changing lanes or merging, drivers are required to check mirrors and blind spots and signal their intent. That duty doesn’t go away just because lane splitting is legal in Minnesota. A driver who drifts into a rider’s path while switching lanes can be found negligent under ordinary traffic law, separate from the intentional obstruction protections in MN Statute 169.18.

That statute adds another layer on top of this. Under MN Statute 169.18, drivers cannot intentionally impede or attempt to prevent a motorcyclist from lane splitting or filtering when the rider is doing so within the conditions set by 169.974. A driver who drifts toward a rider to close the gap, or who speeds up specifically to prevent a pass, may be found at fault even though the motorcyclist was the one moving between lanes.

Motorcyclist Responsibility

Motorcyclists carry real responsibility under this law. They’re the ones who have to judge, in real time, whether a lane split or filter is actually safe. That means staying within the speed thresholds and steering clear of the areas where the maneuver is banned outright, including school zones, work zones, highway on-ramps, and roundabouts. A rider who blows past 25 mph while splitting, or who tries to filter through a roundabout, is no longer operating within what the statute allows, and that can weigh against them in the case of a crash.

Fault in these cases often depends on the details: exact speeds, lane positioning, dash cam or traffic camera footage, witness accounts, and the like. It’s all the evidence an insurance company will try to spin in its favor, which means it’s also the exact information a skilled attorney knows how to secure and use.

Call Our Trusted Minnesota Law Firm Today

If you were hurt in an accident involving a motorcycle, whether you were the one splitting lanes or the one who got hit, you need someone who understands exactly how MN lane splitting laws apply to your situation.

TSR Injury Law has recovered over $1 billion for injury victims across Minnesota. Our attorneys will dig into the facts of your crash and fight to get you the compensation you deserve.

Call us today for a free, no-obligation consultation. You don’t pay us unless we win your case.

What Is an Accident Reconstructionist?

An accident reconstructionist is a trained specialist who analyzes physical evidence from a crash to determine how it happened. Using all available data from the scene of the crash, they rebuild the sequence of events leading up to a collision, often piecing together details that are not obvious from a police report alone.

Their findings can carry real weight in a personal injury claim. Common conclusions an accident reconstructionist may provide include:

• Mechanical failures of the vehicles involved
• Avoidance actions taken by drivers, such as swerving or braking
• The speed of vehicles at the time of impact
• Whether and how brakes were used before the crash

Because this work requires specialized training, accident reconstructionists often serve as expert witnesses. Their testimony can be especially valuable in cases where fault is disputed, since the parties involved rarely agree on what actually happened.

Can an Accident Reconstructionist Determine Driver Intent?

Not directly. An accident reconstructionist cannot read a driver’s mind or state with certainty what someone intended to do. What they can do is establish objective facts. This includes things like speed, braking patterns, vehicle positioning, and more that an attorney can then use to build an argument about a driver’s likely state of mind. Intent is ultimately something a jury or judge decides, but reconstruction evidence can shape how that decision gets made.

Can a Car Accident Reconstructionist Determine Which Car Hit Who?

Yes, and this is often where reconstruction evidence is most useful. By examining skid marks, vehicle damage patterns, debris fields, and points of impact, a reconstructionist can typically determine which vehicle struck the other first, from what angle, and at what point in the roadway. This kind of analysis can settle disputes where both drivers blame each other, especially when there aren’t any independent witnesses to rely on.

How Much Does It Cost To Hire an Accident Reconstructionist Expert?

Costs vary based on the complexity of the crash and the scope of the investigation, but a median range for the total cost of hiring an accident reconstructionist typically falls between $2,500 and $7,500. However, if accident reconstructionist experts need to write reports for the case or testify, the cost can increase exponentially. For cases billed hourly, rates commonly run between $150 and $1,000 per hour, depending on the expert’s credentials, the region, and the work they are doing on the case.

More complex accident reconstruction cases, particularly those involving commercial vehicles, tend to land at the higher end of that range because of the additional data and specialized knowledge required.

Who Pays for an Accident Reconstructionist Expert?

In most personal injury cases, the attorney advances the cost of hiring an accident reconstructionist. This means the client typically doesn’t pay out of pocket while a case is being investigated and litigated. Once the case resolves, the fee is deducted from the final settlement or verdict, along with other case-related costs.

This arrangement allows injury victims to access expert analysis they might not otherwise be able to afford without adding financial strain during an already difficult time. In a personal injury case, hiring an accident reconstructionist could be the difference between the at fault driver’s insurance company denying any responsibility and receiving a fair settlement. An experienced personal injury attorney will know when it makes sense in a particular case to hire an accident reconstructionist.

How Are Qualified Accident Reconstructionists Hired for Litigation?

Attorneys generally turn to established directories to find qualified experts, including ACTAR (the Accreditation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction) and JurisPro. These directories help verify that an expert has the credentials and courtroom experience needed to hold up under scrutiny.

Key qualifications to look for include:

• ACTAR certification
• A Professional Engineering (PE) license
• A track record of courtroom testimony

An expert with strong credentials and experience is far more likely to withstand cross-examination and be viewed as credible.

How Car Accident Reconstruction Differs From Commercial Vehicle Accident Reconstruction

Car Accident Reconstruction

Reconstructing a standard car accident is often more limited in scope. The analysis typically focuses on what happened rather than why. Because passenger vehicles are lighter and their weight distribution is simpler, the physics involved are smaller in scale. Most passenger vehicles also use hydraulic braking systems, which respond with minimal lag compared to the air brake systems found on heavy trucks.

Given this relative simplicity, passenger vehicle accident reconstruction can often be handled just fine by a generalist reconstructionist.

Commercial Vehicle Accident Reconstruction

Commercial vehicle crashes present a different challenge entirely. The physics operate on a much larger scale, and the investigation often has to account for state and federal compliance factors, including how many hours a driver was permitted to be on the road, vehicle inspection requirements, and, frequently, involvement from a corporate legal team.

Because of this added complexity, reconstructionists who take on commercial vehicle accidents are usually specialists in this area. They typically bring:

• Regulatory knowledge, including familiarity with FMCSA rules
• Heavy Vehicle Electronic Data Recorder (HVEDR) certification
• A commercial driver’s license (CDL) of their own

These qualifications allow them to interpret data that a generalist simply would not be equipped to analyze, from engine control module downloads to compliance records that may point to fatigue or maintenance failures.

Call Our Trusted Minnesota Law Firm Today

If you were injured in a car accident or a commercial truck crash in Minnesota, understanding how the crash happened can make all the difference in your case.

TSR Injury Law has spent more than two decades fighting for injured Minnesotans, and we know how to put the right experts to work for you.

Call (612) TSR-TIME for a free consultation, and let’s find out what happened.

Nate Bjerke has become a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, one of the premier legal associations in Minnesota and North America.

The induction ceremony at which Nate became a Fellow took place recently before an audience of approximately 500 during the recent Spring Meeting of the College in La Quinta, California.

Founded in 1950, the American College of Trial Lawyers is widely recognized as the preeminent organization of trial lawyers in North America, composed of the best of the trial bar from the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Fellowship is extended by invitation only, following a rigorous investigation process, to experienced trial lawyers who have demonstrated the highest standards of trial advocacy, ethical conduct, professionalism, civility, and collegiality. Candidates must have at least fifteen years of trial experience before consideration for Fellowship.

The American College of Trial Lawyers includes more than 5,500 Fellows across the U.S. and Canada, all actively striving to preserve and enhance trial practice, civility, professionalism, and the administration of justice through support of an independent judiciary, the rule of law, trial by jury, and access to justice.

Nate Bjerke is a Partner at TSR Injury Law and has been a practicing attorney for nearly 30 years. The newly inducted Fellow is an alumnus of the University of Minnesota Law School.

TSR Injury Law congratulates Nate Bjerke on this distinguished achievement and his continued commitment to excellence in trial advocacy.

Steve Terry
Founding Partner, TSR Injury Law
612-TSR-TIME (612-877-8463)
8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1275, Bloomington, MN 55437

The fatal drowning of six-year-old Isaac Childress III raises an important point about Public Water Access areas. Even if there is a sign saying Public Water Access, it may not be safe to swim.

Childress drowned after he was swept away by the Mississippi River current near Boom Island Park, in an area where the public has access to the river.

Isaac was on a bike ride with some children from his neighborhood and a married couple who also head a local nonprofit organization. They stopped at Boom Island Park and the children were allowed to wade in the Mississippi River. Isaac did not know how to swim. The drop off is quick in this area of the Mississippi River and the current is swift. Just a few feet from shore it is several feet deep.

Signs that only say “Public Water Access” do not specify if the current is too strong, making swimming incredibly dangerous, for children and adults. Even wading in the river can be too dangerous, and parents and adults supervising children should keep this in mind when deciding whether to allow children to swim.

TSR Injury Law Partner Rich Ruohonen represented the family of six-year-old Isaac Childress III in a wrongful death case against the woman responsible for supervising the children.

Isaac’s mother Dominique Alexander wishes the city had posted signs warning of the dangers of swimming in that area. Ruohonen said there was a sign in the area that said “Public Water Access” which can sometimes be interpreted by people as a safe place to swim.

Apparently, the City of Minneapolis and other governmental authorities usually only post signs in designated swimming areas saying it is safe to swim and do not post signs in these areas that are easily accessed by the public that are dangerous. Ruohonen believes governmental authorities need to add signs telling people when it is unsafe to swim such, “No Swimming” or “Danger Strong Current: No Swimming.”

“People just don’t understand the dangers of the river and it is incumbent upon governmental authorities to post warning signs to make a sure tragedy like this never happens again,” Ruohonen said. “There are several cases just like Isaac’s each year and they are easily preventable. We have to do more.”

On May 1, the U.S. Justice Department announced Blue Bell Creameries pled guilty and agreed to pay $19.35 million for shipping contaminated products that were linked to an outbreak of listeriosis in 2015. The guilty plea covers two misdemeanor counts of distributing ice cream products that had been tampered with.

Blue Bell has also agreed to pay $2.1 million for resolving civil claims related to making ice cream in unsanitary conditions and selling it to federal facilities, which violated the False Claims Act.

The former president of Blue Bell, Paul Kruse, is also facing charges of taking part in a scheme to conceal the outbreak from customers.

According to the Department of Justice, Blue Bell distributed ice cream made in unsanitary conditions and was contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, which can be life-threatening.

What Blue Bell Did After Learning of the Outbreak of Listeria

In early 2015, Blue Bell was notified by state officials about two products from a factory in Texas that tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes.

To its credit, Blue Bell took action to remove the remaining two products from store shelves. However, the company did not recall the contaminated products or provide a warning to consumers, even after state officials in Texas discovered listeria in a third product.

Blue Bell did not issue a recall until there were 10 reported cases of listeria in four states. Three of those who were reportedly sick in Kansas ended up dying.

The company released a statement saying the plea deal concerned things that happened five years ago before facilities were closed and revamped. The company also apologized to customers, employees and the communities where they work and live.

The lawyer for former president Kruse said the former president is innocent and he and other employees did the best they possibly could with the information they had back in 2015.

Have You Been Injured by a Defective Product?

Our Bloomington defective product lawyers offer a free consultation to discuss your situation. You may be eligible to seek compensation for the damages you suffered. There is no obligation to take legal action after meeting with us.

We have obtained over a billion in compensation on behalf of our clients and we do not get paid unless our clients are paid first.

Schedule your free consultation today by calling (612) TSR-TIME.

A firework manufacturing operation resulted in one man being hospitalized with burns and it was found that the operation was illegal.

The illegal factory in Wyoming Minnesota experienced a minor flashover explosion in the garage. The result was a 30-year-old man experiencing severe burns.

After the man was taken to Regions Hospital in St. Paul, police discovered the materials that are used in firework manufacturing. After they acquired a search warrant, they found a small and very illegal manufacturing operation, producing illegal fireworks that were of the aerial 2-3 inch mortar style.

Wyoming, Minnesota police, in addition to the St. Paul Bomb Squad and the ATF, dismantled the equipment and removed it from the garage.

Police say that Timothy Gray, David Michael Walsh, and a third man who is in critical condition, were making fireworks out of a backyard shed and a home. The process of mixing some of the components used in fireworks ignited and resulted in the explosion.

Right now Gray and Walsh have been charged with storing and possessing an incendiary device. There are charges pending for the third man who suffered burns over 40 percent of his body.

It was a 911 call that led investigators to the home where they found tables in rows filled with black powder, sawdust, and casings.

Officers said they soon realized it was a homemade firework manufacturing operation.

While not something that authorities run into very often, they believe that the men were able to begin the operation with internet instruction. Upon the confiscation of the manufacturing materials, police also took possession of 12 computers.

Police say that the reason why there is a black market for fireworks is because making them the legal way requires strict regulation to be followed and permits to be acquired. They also said that making fireworks in the midst of a neighborhood is extremely dangerous. A firework is a device that has explosive material compressed in a tube.

The black market exists in Minnesota because it is illegal to have explosive fireworks within state lines, resulting in many individuals crossing the state border to buy them. However, this can lead to the unregulated manufacturing of items that have the potential to cause serious bodily and property damage. If you are a victim of a workplace incident, contact a Minneapolis personal injury attorney at TSR Injury Law today for a free consultation. You may be eligible to file a damages lawsuit.

Ph: (612) TSR-TIME.

The State of Minnesota filed a lawsuit in Hennepin County, Wednesday, against URS Corporation, the state’s I-35 bridge consultant. The suit alleges negligence and breach of contract by URS because they failed to inspect, analyze and evaluate the span’s soundness. In the suit, the state is also asking for URS to reimburse the state more than $37 million in payments made from special victim’s compensation funds and any damages the state may have to pay Progressive Contractors Inc., the construction company that was working on the bridge.

The state alleges that the URS contract specifically required the company to develop tension and compression failure criteria for the bridge’s many components — including the steel gusset plates — using data from how they were supposed to be designed.

URS Corp. is a San Francisco based firm, that had assured the state of its expertise in assessing the need for repairs and the best way to go about doing the repairs. Furthermore, in 2005, URS reported to the state that if “gusset plate buckling occurs, it will not be catastrophic.” In a communication from the corporation in 2006, they told MN-DOT that they would not calculate actual capacities of all of the connections even though that would provide the most accurate results. They said it would be too much work. They proposed to do some approximate but conservative adjustments to the member capacities per design specifications.

The National Transportation Safety Board report, from November 2008, stated that the gusset plates installed when the bridge was built in the 1960s were too thin, and the failure of the plates was a probable cause when the bridge collapsed. The board also stated that findings had pointed to both the bridge’s original flawed design and the spacing of construction materials on the bridge as causes for the collapse.

This information is provided by TSR Injury Law, a premier personal injury law firm serving Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota. Our attorneys were part of the 35W Bridge Collapse Pro Bono Consortium and are now handling six of the personal injury lawsuits from the disaster. For more information call (612) TSR-TIME or submit our free consultation form.

East Bethel has hopped on the wagon with Princeton and other small cities requiring caterers to have a permit to serve alcohol at private events. The new ordinance takes effect Friday, June 12th. They hope that it will keep a tighter rein on alcohol sales from illegitimate caterers at events.

“When there’s liquor involved, it behooves us to make sure our public safety people know,” said East Bethel City Administrator Doug Sell. “It’s also important for the city to know that the individuals serving alcohol are properly insured. Hopefully there’s not an issue but you would hope that they’re properly insured.”

“What they’re concerned about is that people will come in and put a bowl of Fritos out there and chip dip and use that as the excuse to sell food as a foot in the door to sell booze,” said East Bethel City Attorney Jerry Randall. “Cities want to make sure they are legitimate food service operators, not just a pretext to sell booze.”

Caterers are normally licensed by the state and hold liquor licenses in their home municipalities. In the past they have been able to sell liquor in another city without being subject to the same local liquor ordinances that apply to established bars and liquor stores. Now caterers will be required to pay a nominal fee and submit an application and show proof of:

• Valid, state-issued caterer’s permit
• Primary liquor license
• Current insurance policy
• Contract with a local customer

Violations could result in misdemeanor charges being filed.

If you have been injured in a drunk driving accident, contact a Minneapolis car accident lawyer at (612) TSR-TIME or submit a free consultation form. Our partners are skilled, aggressive litigators with years of experience in personal injury law. We support the mission of MADD Minnesota and received the 2008 MADD Choice Award.

A man has been accused of assault and a number of other charges have been filed, as he attempted to kill his wife’s co-worker with a hammer on January 14.

Johnathan Lee Closner, 26, entered his wife’s home in Zumbrota and started attacking Daniel David Yennie, 20, with a hammer, striking them man twice in the head, according to the complaint.

Closner now faces multiple charges, including two counts of attempted premeditated murder, which are both first-degree offenses, and one count of second-degree attempted murder. He also faces a charge of first-degree burglary and first-degree assault.

Police responded to a call at around 4:45 a.m. in which tey found Yennie unconscious in a bedroom and he was having seizures. They also found a large amount of blood all over the wall and the bed.

Amanda Closner, Closner’s wife, told authorities that she was going through a separation with Jonathan Closner. She said that her estranged husband had learned that she was in a relationship with Yennie and that he had been “upset and all crazy” about the news, according to the complaint.

Police would later find a hammer in the woods near Amanda Closner’s residence.

According to the complaint, Johnathan Closner would later admit to police that he came into the residence using a key that was his and that he took a hammer from a tool box. He said he wanted to scare Yennie with the hammer, but he struck Yennie in the head when he saw the man and his estranged wife in the bedroom together.

Yennie was taken to the hospital by mayo One Helicopter. The Mayo Clinic said that Yennie was in a coma due to suffering significant injury to the left side of his head. He also has bone matter penetrating his brain and swelling on the brain.

Johnathan Closner was arrested on January 15 with formal charges being brought against him late on January 16.

If you are the victim of a serious personal injury, contact TSR Injury Law today for a free consultation.

Ph: (612) TSR-TIME.

Minnesota prisons utilize a private contractor for the medical care of prisoners and now that contractor is being sued for the wrongful death of an inmate who died from complications due to seizures in the Rush City prison.

The suit filed in federal court, alleges that a Corizon, Inc. doctor did not order an ambulance to come to the prison when prisoner Xavius Scullark-Johnson started having seizures. The suit further alleges that an ambulance crew was turned away by a nurse at the prison the next morning.

Corizon, which is based in Tennessee, is estimated to receive $28 million for its duties in caring for the 9,200 inmates in Minnesota’s prisons. The Minnesota Department of Corrections has also been named in the lawsuit that questions the quality of care that is being received by inmates.

The lawsuit states that the defendants left Scullark-Johnson in his cell by himself as he had a number of seizures. He was unable to control his body, was disoriented, and had received injuries from the seizures.

Corrections officials state that the Minnesota prison inmates receive the standard of care that the law requires them to have, which they say is equal to the care received by anyone in Minnesota.

In addition to these accusations against the doctor for Corizon, the lawsuit alleges that there were three nurses with the Corrections Department, as well as four prison guards that failed to care for Scullark-Johnson as he suffered as many as six seizures within a five hour period.

Undisclosed records have shown that the corrections officers responsible for Scullark-Johnson did not document his condition although they did remove his cellmate to another area after the cellmate was complaining that an ambulance should be sent.

This lawsuit has raised a number of questions regarding quality of care within prisons since it has been found that nine state prisoners have died due to the alleged denial of medical care. Another 21 inmates have allegedly suffered critical or very serious injuries due to the denial of care. It is believed that the staffing arrangements that are specified within the state’s contract with Corizon have played a role in the death and injury claims. The staffing arrangement entails nurses leaving by 11 p.m., which means corrections officers are the ones in charge of medical care.

According to court documents, the nurse who had turned away the ambulance for Scullark-Johnson, said to corrections investigators that she was not given adequate information by the overnight officers about the condition of Scullark-Johnson. However, the Corrections lieutenant said that she was informed that at least three seizures occurred and that his cellmate said there were at least six or seven seizures. The officer said that the nurse told him to let Scullark-Johnson sleep.

After turning the ambulance away, the nurse returned an hour later and found Scullark-Johnson face down in his cell and he was not responding. The ambulance then returned and the crew took him to a medical center where he was pronounced dead that night. He was taken off life support the next day.

The circus turned into a nightmare when the circus bleachers collapsed about 10 p.m. on Sunday evening at the Circus Juventas event, in Highland Park area, according to St. Paul Police.

There were about 400 people on the bleacher when it collapsed. Sgt. Paul Schnell reported that there were multiple injuries, many people suffered broken bones. At this time, none of the injuries appear to be life-threatening.

Circus Juventas is a performing arts circus school for youth between the ages of 3 and 21. It is based in St. Paul, at 1270 Montreal Avenue.

How Can a Lawyer Help In An Incident Like This?

There is a legal obligation to ensure a reasonable level of safety for anyone invited onto a property. This obligation is referred to in litigation as “premises liability”. Our Minneapolis personal injury attorneys are skilled, aggressive litigators with years of experience. Our partners are experts at establishing fault and proving liability. They have recovered millions for victims. Call (612) TSR-TIME or submit our free consultation form.

On May 23, 2012, a semi-truck driver was convicted by a Minnesota judge on one count of misdemeanor careless driving and three counts of criminal vehicular homicide that all stemmed from a fatal accident that had occurred two years earlier almost to the day. Two women were killed in the accident and one of those women was pregnant.

This is a case that shows how a truck accident can result in both criminal charges and a civil lawsuit.

The 38-year-old driver worked for Reinhart Foodservice and began his shift at 10 p.m. on May 23, 2010. This was the evening before the LaCrosse Wisconsin accident that killed the women. He drove all night long, making stops in Owatanna and Austin, Minnesota. At 11:30 a.m., he was northbound on Interstate 35 when he reached down to grab an energy drink from the passenger side floor of the truck. In his testimony, he stated that he took his eyes off the road for no more than 10 seconds when he looked up and saw that traffic was stopped due to road construction delays.

He was traveling at 68mph when his semi-truck slammed into the back of one of the victims’ vehicles, sending her vehicle into the rear of the other victims’ vehicle. The second victim’s car then slammed into the back of another semi-truck that was hauling 12 million bees. The bees were released at the scene of the accident because of the impact and this delayed the rescue efforts.

The judge came to the conclusion that the driver’s testimony regarding how long he took his eyes off of the road was not credible and that he operated his truck in a grossly negligent manner.

In addition to the criminal charges resulting from the accident, the families of the victims brought civil claims against the driver and his employer. The families settled early in 2012.